Index | Australia | UK | Europe | USA | Canada | Africa | Russia | China | Asia | South America
  Gas Accidents | Environment | Economics | Health | Politics | Citizen Journalism | About Us | Links | Contact Us

Index > Australia > NSW > AGL > ACCC takes action against AGL

Bookmark and Share

Related Stories

AGL Gloucester Milk Experiment
Is Fracking Produced Water Safe in Our Milk?

Exposing the Risks:
Fundamental Flaws in AGL’s application to frack CSG wells in Gloucester

Gloucester Water Studies

2004 gas blow out 300m away in the same wells

Lies, damned lies, statistics
and AGL

ACCC takes action
Dec.2013 against AGL

AGL versus
Environment Protection Agency 2013

AGL fined $1,550,000
for deceptive & misleading conduct 2013

NoFibs Gloucester Showdown

Fracking near Gloucester homes under AGL’s latest coal seam gas plans

Federal member for Lyne
Dr David Gillespie

AGL buys up Hunter Valley vineyards

CSG companies ignore water quality guidelines in irrigation reports

A matter of trust: – letter to Gloucester Advocate

AGL’s Gloucester ‘Produced Water’ Irrigation Trial
“A Sham and a Farce!”

AGL's proposed gas storage facility at Tomago, near Newcastle

2011 NSW Parliament
Inquiry into Coal Seam Gas

Affected Mid North Coast Councils

Upper Hunter Shire Council

Thomas Davey, Tourism Advancing Gloucester

MidCoast Water

New South Wales Farmers Associations Dairy Committee

Bruce Robertson,
Beef cattle farmer

Steven Robinson, Psychiatrist

Barrington-Gloucester-Stroud Preservation Alliance

Manning Alliance

Rob Oakeshott's coal seam gas press releases
2013 - 2012 - 2011 - 2010
Water Trigger - Gloucester BioRegion - Hunter Valley health

AGL's proposed gas storage facility at Tomago, near Newcastle

2011 Gloucester AGL Blockade

Federal | NSW | Victoria | Queensland | Western Australia | South Australia | Tasmania

Coal Seam Gas


Gloucester is awaiting the decision on whether AGL can start fracking 300m from family homes. AGL want to start fracking as soon as possible.

ACCC takes action against AGL South Australia for alleged false or misleading representations

5 December 2013 The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has instituted proceedings in the Federal Court against AGL South Australia Pty Ltd (AGL SA) for making false or misleading representations and engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct.

The alleged conduct relates to representations made by AGL SA to residential electricity consumers in South Australia about the level of discounts off electricity usage charges that could be obtained by consumers under AGL SA’s energy plans.

“AGL SA represented to consumers that if they entered into an energy plan, they would receive a specified discount off the charges they would otherwise pay AGL SA.

However, AGL SA later increased the rates charged to consumers under energy plans and, despite representing that the discounts would continue, the level of discounts that consumers had signed up to was eroded,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.

Specifically, the ACCC alleges that when AGL SA increased rates for energy usage charges under its energy plans in mid-2012 and mid-2013, AGL SA made false or misleading representations to consumers who had entered into an energy plan that they would continue to receive their discount or that there had been no change to the discount, when this in fact was not the case.

“The ACCC alleges that at least from the time of these rate increases, consumers with energy plans effectively received reduced discounts, and in some cases paid more for electricity than if they had been supplied by AGL SA under its standard retail contract,” Mr Sims said.

“For example, the ACCC alleges that consumers who signed up to AGL SA’s Freedom 3% plan between January and June 2012 received three per cent off their energy usage charges.

Following an increase in their rates in July 2012, these consumers were being charged energy usage rates that were approximately 4.6 per cent higher than what they would have been charged under AGL SA’s standard retail contract, leaving them approximately 1.5 per cent worse off than if they had been supplied under the standard retail contract,” Mr Sims said.

“Power bills are a significant, rolling cost for Australian households. Consumers are attracted to energy plans featuring discounts because of the opportunity they offer to reduce these costs,” Mr Sims said.

“Energy retailers are under particular scrutiny from the ACCC for conduct which misleads consumers, as consumer protection in this sector is an ACCC priority.”

The ACCC is seeking pecuniary penalties, declarations, injunctions, publication orders, a compliance program, redress for affected consumers, and costs.


Release number: 274/13.
 

NSW: Pilliga | Gloucester | Camden | Northern Rivers

NSW | Victoria | Queensland | Western Australia | South Australia | Tasmania

 

 

 

site search by freefind