Index | Australia | UK | Europe | USA | Canada | Africa | Russia | China | Asia | South America
  Gas Accidents | Environment | Economics | Health | Politics | Citizen Journalism | About Us | Links | Contact Us

Index > Economics

Bookmark and Share

Related Stories:

Australian Unlisted &
ASX Listed Companies

Solar Booster Shot for Natural Gas Power Plants

Natural Gas Pricing Reform to Facilitate Carbon Tax Policy

Investing in fracking

Global Investors Call For Action on Methane Emissions from Shale Gas And Oil Fracking

Investors Press Oil and Gas Companies to Reduce and Report Risks from Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Investors Press Continental Resources to End Wasteful Flaring of Natural Gas

Shale Development in Western U.S. Poses Significant Risks to Investors

New Tool for Companies, Investors to Manage Risks of Worldwide Water Supply Pressures

Report Shows More Corporations Disclose Water Risk Following SEC Guidance

New York State Pension Fund and Other Investors Urge Utilities to Ramp Up Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Natural Gas Transition to Renewables

Business as Usual More Risky for Electric Utilities

Major Investors Warn Energy Companies of Business Risks in Flaring Gas at Shale Oil Wells

Major Investors Warn Energy Companies of Business Risks in Flaring Gas at Shale Oil Wells - letter

Big Oil and Gas Companies Failing to Inform Investors of Deepwater Drilling and Climate Change Risks

Apex Energy

Gina Rinehart

AGL

AJ Lucas

Armour Energy

Austin Exploration

AWE

Beach Energy

Buru Energy

Dart

Karoon Gas

Magnum Gas & Power

Metgasco

Molopo

Origin Energy

QGC - Owned by BG Group

Santos

Senex Energy

Rawson Resources

Red Sky Energy

CSIRO rejects claims made by APPEA regarding groundwater and coal seam gas

Gasfields Land & Water Commission

 

California | Colorado | Dakota | Marcellus | Massachusetts | Michigan | New York |
Ohio | Pennsylvania | Texas | Utah | Virginia | Wyoming

Fracking Shale & Coal Seam Gas


Australia's LNG nuclear bomb

20 November 2013 - Alan Kohler Business Spectator - The high price of gas in Australia has made replacing coal-fired power stations with gas uneconomic and “fugitive emissions” from the LNG plants mean that reducing overall emissions within Australia by 5 per cent by 2020, as government policy states, will require much bigger cuts in other industries.
_________________________________________________

Doubts grow over ability of gas wells to feed Curtis LNG

19th Nov 2013 - Gladstone Observer - Doubts about the ability of Queensland's coal seams to produce enough gas to feed Gladstone's LNG export plants are growing, with claims that many wells are not producing as expected and that more gas could be needed.

The concerns, which have been rejected by the three proponents spending $70 billion on projects to export gas through Curtis Island, have been backed up by Houston-based drilling supplier Superior Energy Services.

"When we are talking to the operators in Queensland, we hear from them that the coal-seam gas (wells) that currently have been drilled are actually not meeting the production expectations," SES head of Asia Pacific, Ruud Boendermaker, told investors in Houston last week.

"So what they have to do is to drill a lot more CSG wells in the next few years because of the commitments to the LNG trains that they are currently building in the north of Queensland."
_____________________________________

Export forecasts put $20bn LNG project at risk: report

2013-11-15 - AFR - The owners of the $20 billion Arrow coal seam gas project in Queensland are looking for more value in the project, raising doubts about it going ahead as the International Energy Agency downgrades long-term Australian LNG export forecasts.

Surging costs of every big development approved in the past decade have put projects at risk and Royal Dutch Shell and PetroChina have told the Arrow operators to sharpen the cost structure, The Australian reported.

In September, Arrow Energy, the venture between oil majors Shell and PetroChina, secured Queensland government approval for its planned LNG plant in Gladstone, but considerable uncertainty remained whether the partners will proceed with a standalone venture.

The approval meant Arrow now has state-level clearance for three of the five parts of the Arrow LNG project: the LNG plant, and the two pipelines that will take coal seam gas from the Surat and Bowen Basins to Gladstone.

Still outstanding are the approvals for the development of the upstream coal seam gas fields.

Arrow is targeting a final investment decision by early 2014 for the project, but most observers believe it will not go ahead with a stand-alone plant, but will instead link with one of the three existing coal seam gas-based LNG ventures being developed in Queensland.


 

California | Colorado | Dakota | Marcellus | Massachusetts | Michigan | New York |
Ohio | Pennsylvania | Texas | Utah | Virginia | Wyoming

 

 

 

 

site search by freefind