Index | Australia | UK | Europe | USA | Canada | Africa | Russia | China | Asia | South America
  Gas Accidents | Environment | Economics | Health | Politics | Citizen Journalism | About Us | Links | Contact Us

Index > United States of America > Research Aims to Improve Natural Gas Production

Bookmark and Share

Halliburton Loophole

"Father of Fracking"
George Mitchell
concerns over environmental
impacts of fracking

History of Fracking
Only a new technology

USA Fracking Stories

A Texan tragedy

Gas injection may have triggered earthquakes in Texas

California Lags in Fracking Regulations

All In for California Water

Fracking in Michigan

Fracking in Michigan Potential Impact on Health, Environment, Economy

Hydraulic fracturing of Marcellus Shale

Methane Gas from Marcellus Shale Drilling

Marcellus Shale Gas Economics

Health impacts of Marcellus shale gas drilling

Pennsylvania Fracking

Fracking in Virginia

Lesson From Wyoming Fracking

Water Pollution from Fracking

Hydraulic Fracturing Poses Substantial Water Pollution Risks

Methane in drinking water wells

Abandoned gas wells leak

Natural Gas Leaks Discovered in Boston

Methane Leaks Under Streets of Boston

Methane leaks make fracking dirty

Fracking effects real estate values

Fracking stimulates earthquakes

Protecting Gas Pipelines From Earthquakes

Gas Pipeline Earthquake - Simulations

America's crumbling pipelines

Averting Pipeline Failures

Dangers to Underground Pipelines

Gas Pipelines Could Serve as Wireless Links

Government Action needed on a National Energy Policy

EPA Releases Update on Ongoing Hydraulic Fracturing Study

Solar Booster Shot for Natural Gas Power Plants

Natural Gas Pricing Reform to Facilitate Carbon Tax Policy

Investing in fracking

What Oil Prices Have in Store?

Methane Out, Carbon Dioxide In

Health impacts of Marcellus shale gas drilling

Professor Ingraffea

Anti-Fracking Billboard

Natural Gas Drilling

Threats to Biodiversity

Pronghorn Migration
hindered by gas development

Microbes in a Fracking Site

Protozoa May Hold Key to World Water Safety

Shale Gas Production

Research into the Fracking Controversy

Convert Methane Into Useful Chemicals

Methane Natural Gas Into Diesel

'Natural Gas' at the molecular level

Arctic Methane risks

Arctic Methane Seeps

Great Gas Hydrate Escape

Undersea Methane Seep Ecosystem

Methane in the Atmosphere of Early Earth

Methane Natural Gas Linked to Climate Change

Cutting Methane Pollutants Would Slow Sea Level Rise

California | Colorado | Dakota | Marcellus | Massachusetts | Michigan |
Ohio | Pennsylvania | Texas | Utah | Virginia | Wyoming

Shale Gas


Research Aims to Improve Natural Gas Production

4/27/2011 - Missouri University of Science and Technology

ROLLA, Mo. – Natural gas is an abundant energy resource for the United States, but much of it remains trapped in shale or tight-sand formations.

Researchers at Missouri University of Science and Technology hope to develop a way to extract that gas by studying the energy source at the molecular level.

Dr. Baojun Bai, assistant professor of petroleum engineering, is leading the research, which involves looking at how natural gas behaves in these constricted environments.

Working with Bai is Dr. Yinfa Ma, Curators’ Teaching Professor of chemistry, whose single-molecule imaging system will allow the researchers to examine the flow properties of natural gas on a small scale.

The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that tight sands and shale formations may hold up to 460 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, enough to meet current U.S. demand for nearly 21 years.

According to the Natural Gas Supply Association, Americans consume about 22 trillion cubic feet of natural gas a year.

But traditional methods of extracting natural gas will not work in these tight formations, Bai says.

“The problem is that the pore size is so small – only a few nanometers,” he says.

In conventional natural gas reservoirs, the gas flows through pores that are a few micrometers in width.

The difference between nanometers and micrometers is significant. A single nanometer is one billionth of a meter.

A micrometer is one millionth of a meter. That means that a micrometer is 1,000 times larger than a nanometer.

At the nanometer scale, materials behave differently. No one really knows how natural gas flows at that level, Bai says.

So he, Ma and some Missouri S&T graduate students are trying to find out.

“We want an improved understanding of how the gas flows through the pore space – specifically, how natural gas in a nanoscale pore behaves,” Bai says.

“The flow behavior will be different than the conventional behavior, but we don’t know how exactly.”

“With the novel single-molecule imaging system I designed, we can directly monitor the flowing behavior of natural gas, polymer solutions and surfactants in nano-pores, individually or simultaneously,” Ma says.

“This can be used for new flow model developments and correlated with mathematical models developed by our project partners.”

The S&T researchers will also study how the materials used to crack shale in tight formations in order to extract natural gas – the fluids, polymers and surfactants – will affect gas flow.

“We want to find out how to reduce the polymer and surfactant impact on the formation,” Bai says, “because its impact on the formation impacts the gas flow.”

The project is funded through a three-year, $1.2 million grant from the Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America under a U.S. Department of Energy contract.

Through this grant and other funding from research partners, Bai and Ma’s team will study the effect of introducing those materials on “natural gas transportation properties” such as capillary pressure (the force required to squeeze natural gas through a pore), absolute and relative permeability (how well the gas flows through minerals), and non-Darcy flow (which results in turbulence).

Much of the work will take place in Ma’s laboratory, where the researchers will use Ma’s single-molecule imaging system to construct a 3-D model of pores in, for example, a shale natural gas formation.

First, however, they will examine cross-sections of shale by using Missouri S&T’s focused ion beam microscope, or FIB, which is capable of magnifying objects up to a million times their actual size.

The shale samples will come from S&T’s partners on the project: two Houston-based firms, Baker Hughes (formerly BJ Services) and Hess Corp., and other shale-gas operators.

Once they have the FIB-created images of the pores from shale cross-sections, they will reconstruct the cross-sections to create their 3-D model.

“I expect that we can create a new mathematical model to predict the gas flow through the nano-level pores,” Bai says.

In addition, Bai and Ma hope to “comprehensively characterize the pore distribution in the shale, because not all of the rock is homogeneous,” Bai says.

The research should prove useful to the natural gas industry, says Bai, whose background is in enhanced oil recovery.

Working with Bai and Ma on the project are Malek Elgmati, a graduate student in petroleum engineering; Yongpeng Sung and Hao Zhang, both Ph.D. students in petroleum engineering; and Qihua Wu, a Ph.D. student in chemistry.

In addition to the $1.2 million RPSEA grant, the project is supported through Baker Hughes, Hess Corp., Missouri S&T and the Colorado School of Mines.

 

 

 

 

site search by freefind